Man Disses Marriage And Calls It A Trap, Freaks Out When Pregnant GF Won’t Let Baby Carry His Name 

Ah, marriage—it’s not just about love and loyalty, but also about legal rights, joint taxes, and long-term commitment. For some people, it’s the dream—like a Pinterest wedding brought to life. For others, the idea of shared bank accounts and matching towels causes instant stress.

Many couples want the benefits of marriage—like emotional support, financial stability, and even shared parenting—without dealing with the paperwork or legal responsibilities.

But here’s the truth: you can’t enjoy marriage benefits without doing the work. And when it comes to family law and child custody, skipping the formal steps can cause big problems later.

That’s exactly what one woman learned. After finding out she was pregnant, she expected her boyfriend to commit—at least with a ring or some legal acknowledgment. But when he didn’t, she made a bold decision: if there’s no ring, there’s no sharing of the baby’s last name. Seems fair, right? Not to him.

Read for more info Reddit

Skipping the wedding but claiming legacy rights is like quitting a team and still demanding the trophy

One mom-to-be refuses to give her baby her partner’s last name after he claims marriage is a scam but still demands the baby take his name

The man accuses the mom-to-be of trying to pressure him into marriage using the baby, as she refuses to give the child his name

The original poster (OP) and her boyfriend have been together for three years. Their relationship is strong, they’ve talked about having kids, and they seem pretty stable. So what’s the issue? Well, they’re not married—not because they don’t love each other, but because her boyfriend believes marriage is a scam for men. Yes, that tired argument. No vows, no paperwork… but he still wants to leave behind a family legacy. Confusing, right?

Fast forward to a surprise pregnancy. While they weren’t exactly planning for a baby, they also weren’t avoiding it. But when it came time to talk about baby names, things got tense.

The boyfriend wants the child to have his last name. But the OP says absolutely not. Her mindset is simple: no wedding ring, no sharing of the surname. And suddenly, he flips the script—calling her manipulative and accusing her of using the baby’s identity to pressure him into marriage.

But here’s the thing: she’s the one growing the baby, handling the prenatal care, dealing with emotional stress, and preparing for childbirth. So why shouldn’t she get a say in the baby’s last name?

Now the internet is asking—is this a fair decision or emotional blackmail? If someone is so afraid of commitment that they avoid marriage laws and family planning, can they really expect all the benefits of a married life?

And let’s talk about the fear of commitment for a second. It’s called gamophobia, and it’s more common than many realize. It’s not just a fear of weddings or rings—it’s a deep-rooted anxiety about emotional responsibility, legal ties, and long-term obligations.

This isn’t just about child naming rights. It’s about emotional boundaries, relationship equality, and whether someone can demand parental authority without sharing the full load of responsibility.

So, is she protecting her rights or crossing a line? You decide.

To dive deeper into the topic of commitment fears, Bored Panda spoke with Dr. Jane Greer—a respected marriage and family therapist and author of “Am I Lying to Myself? How to Overcome Denial and See the Truth.”

Dr. Greer explained that gamophobia, or the fear of commitment, often comes from deep emotional pain. This can be caused by childhood trauma, divorce, heartbreak, or even abandonment issues. These early experiences can leave emotional scars, making it hard for some people to fully trust or commit again.

So, can someone who fears marriage still build a healthy, long-term relationship? Dr. Greer says yes—but only if both partners are on the same page.

“If both people agree that they don’t need a legal marriage to feel committed, it can definitely work,” she said. “The relationship must be built on mutual respect, emotional safety, and shared values. It has to be a decision both people feel good about.”

But what about talking about the future? People with commitment anxiety often struggle with that. According to Dr. Greer, they usually avoid these talks because thinking long-term causes anxiety. Words like marriage, kids, or buying a house can feel overwhelming. Instead, they focus on the present moment and may give vague or unclear answers when future plans come up.

Can they ever overcome this fear? Absolutely—if they’re willing to try. Dr. Greer recommends individual or couples therapy to help identify the root of the fear. Whether it’s fear of failure, loss of freedom, or old emotional wounds, professional help can make a big difference.

Meanwhile, it’s just as important for the partner to be honest. Let them know how much commitment means to you, and don’t be afraid to talk about your needs. But also, be ready to accept if the other person isn’t ready to grow.

Because here’s the thing: you can’t say “marriage is a scam” and then expect all the benefits that come with it. Wanting your child to carry your last name—especially when that tradition is rooted in patriarchal norms—while refusing marriage? That’s a gender double standard.

Too often, some men want to skip the emotional or legal effort that comes with traditional family roles, but still cling to the parts that give them power—like naming rights.

If we’re tossing out the idea of marriage, then we also need to rethink who gets to choose the child’s name. Equality isn’t something you pick and choose when it benefits you.

Thankfully, this couple found a smart solution. After lots of discussion and soul-searching, they made a co-parenting compromise: the baby will get the mom’s last name as the official surname, the dad’s last name as the middle name, and a family name from his side based on the baby’s gender. Honestly? That’s a win-win.

What do you think—Team Mom or Team Dad? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Netizens side with the woman, saying she is not the jerk for wanting to give her baby her last name